|
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS,
MINNESOTA Mayor Belton
Giving Neighborhoods
Responsibility and Funds for Traffic Safety and Other Improvements
"Traffic safety is
extremely important to ensuring livability for people who live, work,
and play in our city. Pedestrians and motorists alike must feel
confident that traffic is engineered in such a way that risks of
accidents and injuries are minimized. Traffic circles are an effective
traffic calming measure, and when designed well, can be an aesthetic
addition to neighborhood intersections."
-Mayor Belton
Minneapolis sets aside $20
million per year to improve the quality of life in its neighborhoods under
the city’s Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP). Each of the city’s
eighty-one residential neighborhoods may request funds to spend on their
improvements, but these requests must be accompanied by an action plan
that has broad neighborhood involvement and support. NRP plans, in
general, have a three- to five-year implementation horizon.
Sixty-six neighborhoods
have submitted action plans to date, with forty-eight requesting funds to
improve transportation and/or pedestrian safety. Traffic circles and speed
humps are measures frequently requested by the neighborhoods concerned
with traffic safety.
Process for Neighborhood Input and City Action
Once the NRP Policy Board
and the City Council approve a neighborhood’s action plan, the Public
Works staff meets with elected/appointed neighborhood representatives to
identify transportation- and safety-related problems. Staff solicits
suggestions from the neighborhood representative for solutions to
identified problems. Public Works staff offers comment and suggests one or
more solutions that address the identified transportation problem,
stressing the city’s experience with each. These discussions are
documented.
Where indicated, Public
Works staff conducts engineering studies to substantiate the nature and
severity of identified problems. After review and comment, Public Works
staff recommends specific solutions, giving reasons for the
recommendations. When the neighborhood and Public Works reach a consensus
on the problem and a solution is agreed upon, Public Works staff prepares
a petition for neighborhood volunteers to circulate to affected residents
and property owners. The petition asks the city to test the proposed
solution. In most cases before-and-after studies document the test
solution’s effectiveness. If the test is successful, neighborhood
volunteers circulate a second staff-prepared petition, asking the city to
construct a permanent measure.
On completion of the
construction, the Public Works Finance Section bills the neighborhood
account - within the annual $20 million set aside for NRP - for payment of
the testing and construction costs incurred.
Traffic Circles
For the last seventy-five
years, the base-posted speed limit in urbanized areas of Minnesota has
been thirty miles per hour. Over the years, as handling qualities of the
fleet improved, the average and 85th percentile speed on city streets
began to creep upward. By 1982, Minneapolis began implementing a
basket-weave stop sign plan to control traffic on local streets and reduce
the number and severity of accidents at uncontrolled intersections. Today
the pattern of placing alternating two-way stop signs at every other block
is virtually complete.
By the mid-1990s, however,
city residents expressed growing concern over the volume and speed of
vehicles going through their neighborhoods Ñ in spite of the growing
number of stop signs. At the same time, a citizen movement to reclaim
ownership of city streets began to gain momentum. City residents became
increasingly inclined to redefine collector and arterial streets as
neighborhood ("local") streets. They began pressing the city’s elected
officials and staff to implement physical measures that would limit
vehicle speed and volumes not only on local streets, but on collector and
arterial streets as well. Traffic circles moved to the fore as one of the
key measures to accomplish these objectives, and Minneapolis began
experimenting with the concept in 1994.
Geometrics: Design and Signing of a Minneapolis Traffic
Circle
A traffic circle in
Minneapolis is a 3.6 meter (twelve-foot) to 7.3 meter (twenty-four-foot)
diameter circle placed at the crossing of the centerlines of two
intersecting local streets. Except in rare circumstances, the intersection
has four approach legs. Mountable by emergency vehicles, the traffic
circle’s curb is ten centimeters (four inches) high at the outside and
fifteen centimeters (six inches) high at the inside edge Ñ as measured
from street level. The width of the curb is 60.9 centimeters (twenty-four
inches), and the circle has no gutter.
Landscaped in the center,
the circle is subject to a 0.9 meter (three-foot) clear zone from the
inside edge of its curb, in which nothing growing higher than 45
centimeters (eighteen inches) may be planted. A tree may be planted in the
center of traffic circles whose diameter is 4.9 meters (sixteen feet) or
greater.
Care is taken that the
intersection is well lit. Facing each approach, a nine-point diamond sign
is mounted 0.9 meters (three feet) inside the inner edge of the circle’s
curb. Warning signs are posted forty-five to sixty meters (150 to 200
feet) on each approach in advance of every intersection containing a
traffic circle. Where volumes warrant, obstruction approach markings are
painted on the pavement.
Minneapolis prohibits
on-street parking for a distance of twelve meters (forty feet) Ñ measured
from the nearest curb face of the intersecting street Ñ on both sides of
each approach street. This measure is taken to accommodate the turn
characteristics of Metro Transit vehicles, fire emergency vehicles, school
buses, and city garbage trucks. Advisory signs describing acceptable
turning behavior are also posted at the traffic circle. (See diagram with
traffic calming signs.)
The Public Works
Department requires a twenty-two foot clearance between the outside edge
of a traffic circle and an intersection’s curved curb sections to allow
for snow accumulation, safe vehicle movement past the circle, and safe
conditions for pedestrians in the crosswalks.
Geometrics: (T) Intersections
Though Minneapolis’s first
two permanent traffic circles were installed at (T) intersections, such
installations are no longer permitted, except under very controlled
circumstances. In the city’s experience, the effectiveness of a traffic
circle depends on the forced, lateral deflection of a vehicle from its
straight-line path. Where on-street parking is present virtually
twenty-four hours a day, a vehicle approaching a traffic circle cannot run
the gutter for a distance greater than forty feet. The driver must slow
his/her vehicle to comfortably negotiate around the traffic circle. This
condition of omnipresent on-street parking is the rare exception in
Minneapolis, but was the condition that prevailed at the locations of the
first traffic circle installations. Where traffic circles were tested at
the more ordinary (T) intersections, it was found that gutter-running
speeds actually increased over pre-test speeds. Now the Public Works
Department will permit traffic circles at (T) intersections only if
permanent bump-outs (throats) are constructed on the approaches to prevent
gutter-running behavior.
Costs
Construction costs range
from $3,500 to $4,000 for a traffic circle in the center of a four-legged
intersection, depending on the size of the circle. These costs include
associated signage, pavement marking, soil replacement, and sodding. They
do not include the cost of landscaping beyond sodding. The construction of
throats at (T) intersections interrupts curbside drainage patterns and
requires addition or relocation of catch basins and associated storm sewer
lines. Costs in these situations can range from $8,500 to almost
$40,000.
Lessons Learned about Traffic Circles
Minneapolis has learned the following from testing and constructing
traffic circles:
- Traffic circles reduce
vehicle speeds. Properly designed and installed, traffic circles reduce
average and 85th percentile vehicle speeds to the twenty-two to
twenty-seven mile per hour range (mph).
- The traffic circle must
be well lit.
- Under certain
circumstances, traffic circles may cause a diversion of traffic. In one
instance, more than 700 vehicles per day were redirected from a
three-block-long segment of an impacted local street back to a
paralleling arterial street one block (200 meters or 660 feet) distant.
The sequence of measures on the local street was: traffic circle stop
sign.
- The number of
fixed-object accidents may increase when a traffic circle is installed
on a collector or arterial street.
- It is no longer
recommended that a tree be planted in a traffic circle with a diameter
less than 4.9 meters (16 feet).
- Stop signs are used to
define a right-of-way at an intersection containing a traffic circle as
opposed to the former practice of using yield signs.
- Traffic circles are no
longer tested or constructed at (T) intersections except under very
controlled circumstances, as noted above.
- Traffic circles are no
longer tested or constructed on collector or arterial streets.
- All traffic circles now
tested or constructed must conform to the geometrics noted above.
Speed Humps
Stop signs and traffic
circles modify driver behavior at intersections. Speed humps modify driver
behavior between intersections. Prior to installing speed humps, Public
Works staff verifies vehicle speed conditions on the street segment in
question and determines the appropriateness of a speed hump application.
If a favorable finding is made, staff prepares a petition that
neighborhood volunteers circulate to all affected residents and property
owners. The petition asks the city to install a pair of speed humps and
indicates a willingness to pay for the humps whether by assessment or out
of neighborhood NRP funds. Since the humps cannot be tested for a short
time as can traffic circles, the neighborhood must make provision for the
humps’ removal in the event the petitioners are not satisfied with the
humps or their results.
Geometrics
Speed humps are between
seven and eight centimeters (three inches) high, 3.6 meters (twelve feet)
wide and stretch across the traveled roadway from edge of gutter pan to
edge of gutter pan. Properly designed and installed, speed humps will not
interfere with normal curbside drainage. Speed humps are installed in
pairs, spaced about 250 feet apart. However, the city will not install
more than four speed humps per half-mile. Elected officials approved
criteria for speed hump use in August 1994. (See the diagram for speed
humps signing.)
Costs
Minneapolis’s cost for
installing, striping and signing a pair of speed humps is
$7,000.
Lessons Learned about Speed Humps
The experience with speed
humps in Minneapolis follows:
- They work. When used in
pairs, they reduce average and 85th percentile mid-block speeds to the
fifteen to twenty mph range.
- The city does not
install speed humps on collector or arterial streets, public transit bus
routes, designated truck routes, or primary emergency vehicle access
routes.
- Speed humps are not
installed on local streets with volumes less than 500 or more than 2,000
vehicles per day.
- Neither are they
installed on streets with adverse geometry, such as steep grades, sharp
vertical or horizontal curves, or streets whose stopping distance sight
lines are less than 200 feet.
- Residents on streets
with speed humps have generally been pleased.
Available Materials
The Minneapolis Public
Works Department has handout materials on the NRP and traffic
improvements, including:
- "Partners for a New
Transportation Future," a two-page description of the process for Public
Works Department and neighborhood interaction;
- "Criteria for Speed
Hump Use," a one-page description;
- a one-page flyer on
traffic circles;
- a one-page diagram of
typical signing and marking for speed humps;
- a one-page diagram of
pavement marking detail; and
- a one-page diagram of
typical cross-sections for traffic calming.
Contact: Michael J.
Monahan, Assistant Director of Public Works, Director of Transportation,
Minneapolis, telephone: 612/673-2411; FAX: 612/673-2149.
Table of Contents
Return to Previous
Page.
|